Investment Company Assets in 2016

US‑registered investment companies* managed $19.2 trillion in assets at year-end 2016, $1.1 trillion more than at year-end 2015 (Figure 1.1). Broad-based gains in US stock markets contributed to the increase. International stock markets posted increases in dollar terms, despite the dollar strengthening against the currencies of some of its major trading partners. The gains in dollar-denominated asset values contributed to the year-over-year increase in assets managed by US investment companies.

* The terms investment companies and US investment companies are used at times throughout this book in place of US‑registered investment companies. US‑registered investment companies are open-end mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds, and unit investment trusts.

As measured by the MSCI All Country World Daily ex-US Gross Total Return Index.

The US mutual fund and exchange-traded fund (ETF) markets—with combined assets of $18.9 trillion at year-end 2016—remained the largest in the world, accounting for 47 percent of the $40.4 trillion in regulated open-end fund assets worldwide (Figure 1.2).

The majority of US mutual fund and ETF assets at year-end 2016 were in long-term funds, with equity funds comprising 56 percent (Figure 1.2). Within equity funds, domestic funds (those that invest primarily in shares of US corporations) held 42 percent of total assets and world funds (those that invest significantly in shares of non-US corporations) accounted for 14 percent. Bond funds held 22 percent of US mutual fund and ETF assets. Money market funds, hybrid funds, and other funds—such as those that invest primarily in commodities—held the remainder (22 percent).


Investment Company Total Net Assets by Type

Billions of dollars; year-end, 1998–2016

YearMutual funds1Closed-end funds2ETFs3UITsTotal4
1998 $5,525 $156 $16 $94 $5,790
1999 6,846 147 34 92 7,119
2000 6,965 143 66 74 7,247
2001 6,975 141 83 49 7,248
2002 6,383 159 102 36 6,680
2003 7,402 214 151 36 7,803
2004 8,096 253 228 37 8,614
2005 8,891 276 301 41 9,509
2006 10,398 297 423 50 11,168
2007 12,000 312 608 53 12,974
2008 9,621 184 531 29 10,365
2009 11,113 223 777 38 12,151
2010 11,834 238 992 51 13,114
2011 11,633 242 1,048 60 12,983
2012 13,054 264 1,337 72 14,727
2013 15,049 279 1,675 87 17,090
2014 15,873 289 1,975 101 18,238
2015 15,650 261 2,101 94 18,106
2016 16,344 262 2,524 85 19,215

Download an Excel file of this data.

1 Mutual fund data exclude mutual funds that invest primarily in other mutual funds.
2 Closed-end fund data include preferred share classes.
3 ETF data prior to 2001 were provided by Strategic Insight Simfund. ETF data include ETFs not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and exclude ETFs that primarily invest in other ETFs.
4 Total investment company assets include mutual fund holdings of closed-end funds and ETFs.
Note: Data are for investment companies that report statistical information to the Investment Company Institute. Assets of these companies comprise 98 percent of investor assets. Components may not add to the total because of rounding.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and Strategic Insight Simfund

Mutual funds recorded $229 billion in net outflows in 2016 (Figure 2.4), while other US‑registered investment companies attracted new investments. On net, investors redeemed $199 billion from long-term mutual funds. Money market funds also experienced net outflows of $30 billion. Mutual fund shareholders reinvested $227 billion in income dividends and $213 billion in capital gains distributions that mutual funds paid out during the year. Investors continued to show strong demand for ETFs with net share issuance (which includes reinvested dividends) totaling $284 billion in 2016 (Figure 3.7). Unit investment trusts (UITs) had new deposits of $49 billion, a modest decrease from the previous year, and closed-end funds issued $922 million in new shares, on net (Figure 4.3).


The United States Has the World’s Largest Regulated Open-End Fund Market

Percentage of total net assets, year-end 2016

Figure 1.2

Download an Excel file of this data.

* This category includes ETFs—both registered and not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940—that invest primarily in commodities, currencies, and futures.
Note: Regulated open-end funds include mutual funds, ETFs, and institutional funds. Components may not add to 100 percent because of rounding.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and International Investment Funds Association

Americans’ Continued Reliance on Investment Companies

Households make up the largest group of investors in funds, and registered investment companies managed 22 percent of household financial assets at year-end 2016 (Figure 1.3).

The growth of individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and defined contribution (DC) plans, particularly 401(k) plans, explains some of the increased household reliance on investment companies during the past two decades. IRAs made up 10.4 percent of household financial assets at year-end 2016, with mutual funds managing 47 percent of IRA assets (Figure 1.4). At year-end 2016, households had 9.3 percent of their financial assets in 401(k) and other DC retirement plans, up from 8.2 percent in 1996. Mutual funds managed 55 percent of the assets in these plans in 2016, nearly double the 29 percent in 1996. Mutual funds also managed $1.2 trillion in variable annuities outside retirement accounts, as well as nearly $7.6 trillion of other assets outside retirement accounts.


Share of Household Financial Assets Held in Investment Companies

Percentage of household financial assets; year-end, 1980–2016

Figure 1.3

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Household financial assets held in registered investment companies include household holdings of ETFs, closed-end funds, UITs, and mutual funds. Mutual funds held in employer-sponsored DC plans, IRAs, and variable annuities are included.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and Federal Reserve Board


Mutual Funds in Household Retirement Accounts

Percentage of retirement assets in mutual funds by type of retirement vehicle, 1996–2016

Figure 1.4

Download an Excel file of this data.

* This category includes private employer-sponsored DC plans (including 401(k) plans), 403(b) plans, 457 plans, and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) Thrift Savings Plan (TSP).
Sources: Investment Company Institute, Federal Reserve Board, Department of Labor, National Association of Government Defined Contribution Administrators, American Council of Life Insurers, and Internal Revenue Service Statistics of Income division. See Investment Company Institute, “The US Retirement Market, Fourth Quarter 2016.”

Businesses and other institutional investors also rely on funds. Many institutions use money market funds to manage some of their cash and other short-term assets. Nonfinancial businesses held 22 percent of their short-term assets in money market funds at year-end 2016 (Figure 1.5). Institutional investors also have contributed to growing demand for ETFs. Investment managers­—including mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds, and insurance companies­—use ETFs to invest in markets, to manage liquidity and investor flows, or to hedge their exposures.


Money Market Funds Managed 22 Percent of US Nonfinancial Businesses’ Short-Term Assets in 2016

Percent; year-end, selected years

Figure 1.5

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: US nonfinancial businesses’ short-term assets consist of foreign deposits, checkable deposits, time and savings deposits, money market funds, repurchase agreements, and commercial paper.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and Federal Reserve Board

Role of Investment Companies in Financial Markets

Investment companies have been among the largest investors in the domestic financial markets for much of the past 20 years. They have held a fairly stable share of the securities outstanding across a variety of asset classes. At year-end 2016, investment companies held approximately 31 percent of the shares of US-issued equities outstanding, up slightly from 29 percent in 2013 (Figure 1.6). Investment companies also held 19 percent of bonds issued by domestic corporations and foreign bonds held by US residents at year-end 2016. The percentage of bonds outstanding held by investment companies has been unchanged since 2013, with mutual funds holding a significantly larger share of corporate bonds relative to other registered investment companies.

Investment companies also held 13 percent of the US Treasury and government agency securities outstanding at year-end 2016, a share that has remained fairly stable since 2013 (Figure 1.6). As a whole, investment companies have been one of the largest groups of investors in US municipal securities, holding 23 percent of the municipal securities outstanding at year-end 2016.


Investment Companies Channel Investment to Stock, Bond, and Money Markets

Percentage of total market securities held by investment companies; year-end, 2013–2016

Figure 1.6

Download an Excel file of this data.

1 Total US Treasury and government agency securities held by other registered investment companies was less than 0.5 percent in each year.
2 Other registered investment companies held no commercial paper in each year.
Note: Components may not add to the total because of rounding.
Sources: Investment Company Institute, Federal Reserve Board, and World Federation of Exchanges

Historically, mutual funds have been one of the largest investors in the US commercial paper market—an important source of short-term funding for major corporations around the world. Mutual fund demand for commercial paper arose primarily from prime money market funds. In 2016, however, the assets of prime money market funds fell 70 percent (nearly $900 billion) as these funds adapted to the 2014 SEC rule amendments that required the money market fund industry to make substantial changes by October 2016 (see chapter 2). Consequently, prime money market funds sharply reduced their holdings of commercial paper. From year-end 2015 to year-end 2016, mutual funds’ share of the commercial paper market fell from 40 percent to 19 percent (Figure 1.6).

Types of Intermediaries and Number of Investment Companies

A variety of financial services companies offer registered funds in the United States. At year-end 2016, 81 percent of investment company complexes were independent fund advisers (Figure 1.7), and these firms managed 69 percent of investment company assets. Other types of investment company complexes in the US market include non-US fund advisers, insurance companies, banks, thrifts, and brokerage firms.


More Than 80 Percent of Investment Company Complexes Were Independent Fund Advisers

Percentage of investment company complexes by type of intermediary, year-end 2016

Figure 1.7

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Components do not add to 100 percent because of rounding.

In 2016, 850 fund sponsors from around the world competed in the US market to provide investment management services to fund investors (Figure 1.8). The decrease in the number of fund sponsors since year-end 2015 may be due to a variety of business decisions including larger fund sponsors acquiring smaller ones, fund sponsors liquidating funds and leaving the business, or larger sponsors selling their advisory businesses. In recent years, the number of fund sponsors had been increasing as the economy and financial markets recovered from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. After 2009, 500 sponsors entered the market while 332 left, for a net increase of 168.

Figure 1.8

Number of Fund Sponsors


Figure 1.8

Download an Excel file of this data.

Many of the entering sponsors adopt solutions in which the fund’s sponsor arranges for a third party to provide certain services (e.g., audit, trustee, some legal) through a turnkey setup. This allows the sponsor to focus more on managing portfolios and gathering assets. Through an arrangement known as a series trust, the third party provides services to a number of independent fund sponsors under a single complex that serves as an “umbrella.” This can be cost-efficient because the costs of operating funds are spread across the combined assets of a number of funds in the series trust.

The increased availability of other investment products has led to changes in how investors are allocating their portfolios. The percentage of mutual fund companies retaining assets and attracting net new investments generally has been lower in recent years. In 2016, 32 percent of fund complexes saw inflows to their long-term mutual funds; 71 percent of ETF sponsors had positive net share issuance (Figure 1.9).

Figure 1.9

Positive Net Share Issuance of ETFs and Positive Net New Cash Flow to Long-Term Mutual Funds

Percentage of fund complexes, 2005–2016

Figure 1.9

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Data do not include funds that invest primarily in other funds.

The decline in the percentage of fund complexes attracting new money likely reflects, in part, the influx of new entrants and an increasing concentration of mutual fund and ETF assets managed by the largest fund complexes. The share of assets managed by the five largest firms rose from 36 percent in 2005 to 47 percent in 2016, and the share managed by the 10 largest firms increased from 47 percent to 58 percent (Figure 1.10). Some of the increase in market share occurred at the expense of the middle tier of firms—those ranked from 11 to 25—whose market share fell from 22 percent in 2005 to 18 percent in 2016.

Figure 1.10

Share of Mutual Fund and ETF Assets at the Largest Fund Complexes

Percentage of total net assets of mutual funds and ETFs; year-end, selected years

Largest 5 complexes 36 42 45 47
Largest 10 complexes 47 55 56 58
Largest 25 complexes 69 74 75 76

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Data include only mutual funds and ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Mutual fund data do not include mutual funds that invest primarily in other mutual funds. ETFs registered as UITs and ETFs that invest primarily in other ETFs are excluded.

At least two factors have contributed to the rise in industry concentration. First, the growing popularity of index funds increased concentration because the 10 largest fund complexes manage most of the assets in index mutual funds. Actively managed domestic equity mutual funds had outflows in every year since 2005, while index domestic equity mutual funds and ETFs had inflows in each of these years. Second, strong inflows over the past decade to bond mutual funds (Figure 2.8), which are fewer in number and are less likely to be offered by smaller fund sponsors, helped boost the share of assets managed by large fund complexes.

Macroeconomic conditions and competitive dynamics can affect the supply of funds offered for sale. Fund sponsors create new funds to meet investor demand, and they merge or liquidate those that do not attract sufficient investor interest. A total of 655 mutual funds and ETFs opened in 2016, the fewest since 2009 and well below the 2005–2015 annual average of 823 (Figure 1.11). The rate of mutual fund and ETF mergers and liquidations increased significantly from 542 in 2015 to 697 in 2016.

Figure 1.11

Number of Mutual Funds and ETFs Entering and Exiting the Industry


Figure 1.11

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Data include mutual funds that do not report statistical information to the Investment Company Institute and mutual funds that invest primarily in other mutual funds. ETF data include ETFs not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 but exclude ETFs that invest primarily in other ETFs.

The total number of investment companies has increased since 2005 (the recent low point), but it remains well below the year-end 2000 peak (Figure 1.13). This largely reflects the sharp decline in UITs in the early 2000s. The number of UITs declined to 5,103 at year-end 2016 from 5,188 at year-end 2015. The number of mutual funds decreased slightly in 2016 to a total of 9,511 funds. The total number of closed-end funds fell to 530 at year-end 2016, the lowest level since 2001. The number of ETFs continues to grow, with 1,716 ETFs at year-end 2016, more than double the total number of ETFs at year-end 2009.

Unit Investment Trusts

Unit investment trusts (UITs) are registered investment companies with characteristics of both mutual funds and closed-end funds. Like mutual funds, UITs issue redeemable shares (called units), and like closed-end funds, they typically issue a specific, fixed number of shares. But unlike either mutual funds or closed-end funds, UITs have a preset termination date based on the portfolio’s investments and the UIT’s investment goals. UITs investing in long-term bonds might have a preset termination date of 20 to 30 years, depending on the maturity of the bonds they hold. UITs investing in stocks might seek to capture capital appreciation in a few years or less. When a UIT terminates, proceeds from the securities are paid to unit holders or, at a unit holder’s election, reinvested in another trust.

UITs fall into two main categories: bond trusts and equity trusts. Bond trusts are either taxable or tax-free; equity trusts are either domestic or international/global. The first UIT, introduced in 1961, held tax-free bonds, and historically, most UIT assets were invested in bonds. Equity UITs, however, have grown in popularity over the past two decades. Assets in equity UITs have exceeded the combined assets of taxable and tax-free bond UITs in recent years, and constituted 85 percent of the assets in UITs in 2016 (Figure 1.12). The number of trusts outstanding has been decreasing as sponsors created fewer new trusts and existing trusts reached their preset termination dates.

Federal law requires that UITs have a largely fixed portfolio—one that is not actively managed or traded. Once the trust’s portfolio has been selected, its composition may change only in very limited circumstances. Most UITs hold a diversified portfolio, described in detail in the prospectus, with securities professionally selected to meet a stated investment goal, such as growth, income, or capital appreciation.

Investors can obtain UIT price quotes from brokerage or investment firms and investment company websites, and some but not all UITs list their prices on NASDAQ’s Mutual Fund Quotation Service. Some broker-dealers offer their own trusts or sell trusts offered by nationally recognized independent sponsors. Units of these trusts can be bought through their registered representatives. Units can also be bought from the representatives of smaller investment firms that sell trusts sponsored by third-party firms.

Though a fixed number of units of a UIT are sold in a public offering, a trust sponsor is likely to maintain a secondary market, in which investors can sell their units back to the sponsor and other investors can buy those units. Even absent a secondary market, UITs are required by law to redeem outstanding units at their net asset value (NAV), which is based on the underlying securities’ current market value.

Figure 1.12

Total Net Assets and Number of UITs

Year-end, 2005–2016

Figure 1.12

Download an Excel file of this data.

Note: Components may not add to the total because of rounding.

Figure 1.13

Number of Investment Companies by Type

Year-end, 1998–2016

 YearMutual funds1Closed-end fundsETFs2UITsTotal
1998 7,489 491 29 10,966 18,975
1999 8,003 510 30 10,414 18,957
2000 8,370 481 80 10,072 19,003
2001 8,518 489 102 9,295 18,404
2002 8,511 543 113 8,303 17,470
2003 8,426 581 119 7,233 16,359
2004 8,417 618 152 6,499 15,686
2005 8,449 634 204 6,019 15,306
2006 8,721 645 359 5,907 15,632
2007 8,745 662 629 6,030 16,066
2008 8,879 642 728 5,984 16,233
2009 8,611 627 797 6,049 16,084
2010 8,535 624 923 5,971 16,053
2011 8,673 632 1,135 6,043 16,483
2012 8,744 602 1,195 5,787 16,328
2013 8,972 599 1,295 5,552 16,418
2014 9,258 568 1,412 5,381 16,619
2015 9,517 558 1,595 5,188 16,858
2016 9,511 530 1,716 5,103 16,860

Download an Excel file of this data.

1 Data include mutual funds that invest primarily in other mutual funds.
2 ETF data prior to 2001 were provided by Strategic Insight Simfund. ETF data include ETFs not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and ETFs that invest primarily in other ETFs.
Note: Data are for investment companies that report statistical information to the Investment Company Institute. Assets of these companies are 98 percent of investor assets.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and Strategic Insight Simfund

Investment Company Employment

Registered investment companies typically do not have employees—instead, they contract with other businesses to provide services to the fund. Except for UITs, funds in the United States have fund boards that oversee the management of the fund and represent the interests of the fund shareholders. Fund boards must approve all major contracts between the fund and its service providers including the advisory contract with a fund’s investment adviser, who is usually also the fund’s sponsor.

Fund sponsors and third-party service providers offer advisory, recordkeeping, administrative, custody, and other services to a growing number of funds and their investors. Fund industry employment in the United States has grown 53 percent since 1997, from 114,000 workers in 1997 to 174,000 workers in 2015 (Figure 1.14).

Figure 1.14

Investment Company Industry Employment

Estimated number of employees of fund sponsors and their service providers, selected years*

Figure 1.14

Download an Excel file of this data.

* Years are those in which ICI conducted its employment survey.

Fund investment advisers are one of the prominent providers of services to funds. This group of service providers is responsible for managing the fund’s business affairs, ensuring compliance with laws and regulations, overseeing other third-party service providers the fund may rely on, and directing funds’ investments by undertaking investment research and determining which securities to buy and sell. The adviser will often undertake trading and security settlement for the fund. In March 2015, 38 percent of the industry worked in support of fund management functions such as investment research, trading and security settlement, information systems and technology, and other corporate management functions (Figure 1.15).

The second-largest group of workers (28 percent) provides services to fund investors and their accounts (Figure 1.15). Shareholder account servicing encompasses a wide range of activities to help investors monitor and update their accounts. These employees work in call centers and help shareholders and their financial advisers with questions about investor accounts. They also process applications for account openings and closings. Other services include retirement plan transaction processing, retirement plan participant education, participant enrollment, and plan compliance.

Figure 1.15

Investment Company Industry Employment by Job Function

Percentage of employees of fund sponsors and their service providers, March 2015

Figure 1.15

Download an Excel file of this data.

Distribution and sales force personnel together accounted for 24 percent of the workforce (Figure 1.15). Employees in these areas may work in marketing, product development and design, or investor communications, and can include sales support staff, registered representatives, and supermarket representatives.

Fund administration, which includes financial and portfolio accounting and regulatory compliance duties, accounted for 10 percent of industry employment (Figure 1.15). Employees performing those services are often affiliated with a fund’s investment adviser. Fund administration encompasses the middle- and back-office functions necessary to operate the fund, and includes clerical and fund accounting services, data processing, recordkeeping, internal audits, and compliance and risk management functions.

Typically, employees with administration duties are responsible for regulatory and compliance requirements, such as preparing and filing regulatory reports, overseeing fund service providers, preparing and submitting reports to regulators and tax authorities, and producing shareholder reports such as prospectuses and financial statements of the funds. Administration services also help to maintain compliance procedures and internal controls, subject to approval by a fund’s board and chief compliance officer.

For many industries, employment tends to be concentrated in locations where the industry began. The same is true for investment companies: those located in Massachusetts and New York, early hubs of investment company operations (Figure 1.16), employ 24 percent of fund industry workers. As the industry has grown, other states—including California, Pennsylvania, and Texas—have become major centers of fund employment. Fund companies in these three states employed one-quarter of US fund industry employees as of March 2015.

Figure 1.16

Investment Company Industry Employment by State

Estimated number of employees of fund sponsors and their service providers by state, March 2015

Figure 1.16

Download an Excel file of this data.

Back to Top